http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/12/jon-kate-gosselin-finally-sell-original-home-profit
Radaronline is reporting Jon and Kate's Andrew's Ave. house has sold for around $300,000.
The price was just recently dropped from the mid-300's, a number very likely far too high to generate any interest in this market.
13 sediments (sic) from readers:
If walls could speak. I hope the buyer throws around some holy water and has a spiritual cleansing. There is no telling what sort of negative energy Kate left behind.
It will be interesting to see who bought the house, my bet is TLc.
I firmly believe that TLC is doing whatever they can to keep Kate happy until after the trial with Jon. The filming of Kate in NC the other day was just to string her along. I believe that TLC will in fact attempt to do a show with Kate knowing that it will ultimatly fail, but meanwhile will be a ploy to keep Kate in line. The worst thing for TLC would be for Jon and Kate to become friendly enemies and join force against them. TLC knows that and so they keep stringing her along and biding time until they can break Jon and get him to agree to let them once again film the kids. Just my opinion.
That's an interesting theory Debbie. it will be interesting to see how TLC gets rid of Kate. It will also be interesting when she realizes that she and her family have been used. Will she turn around and sue TLC. Probably. TLC is using the divide and conquer on Jon and Kate. Even Jon pointed out that TLC is controlling Kate's life.
Jon says TLC controls Kate's life, but SHE is too stupid to realize it. OMG, wouldn't it be a thrill to be able to tell your family and friends (and even strangers on the street) "I" live in KATE'S house, so do I get stuff served to me on a gold platter too????
I think it's too much of a coincidence that there was a contract for the Andrew's Ave house right at the time they were finalizing the divorce settlement and almost exactly a year from the time they bought their new one -- kinda sounds to me like TLC made a deal with them to purchase it if it didn't sell within a year and/or was part of the agreement to keep Kate happy and receiving income. We'll see when the papers come through whether the house is in someone's name or hidden behind a trust/attorney name.
Is there any truth to a "Brady Bunch" law that prohibits any reruns of a show that feature a house that belongs to a new owner? If this is true, I can see TLC buying the house.
I haven't heard that. I would think that's not true, it would give a new owner of a house too much power. TV and even movies are filmed all the time in the suburbs of Los Angeles. A lot of middle America houses are filmed in Pasadena, for example. And owners change all the time. I do know that the owners of the Full House house are different than those who lived there at the time of the show, and that the new owners were never told their new house was part of a popular TV show until people started showing up on their doorstep taking pictures! That show has been in reruns for years.
My sister-in-law unknowingly bought the house of the sister and mother of the murderers of Ted Ammon by Danny Pelosi. Both women have the same first name. It was after she moved in and was getting calls from TV stations and magazines are far away as Australia that she realized the murder was planned in her kitchen. BTW after the walk-through, the kids returned to the house and totally trashed it. Feces everywhere, holes in walls. My husband (her brother) passed away the day before. So between grieving for her brother she was totally horrified at what happened to her new house. Really classy people.
My sister-in-law unknowingly bought the house of the sister and mother of the murderers of Ted Ammon by Danny Pelosi. Both women have the same first name. It was after she moved in and was getting calls from TV stations and magazines are far away as Australia that she realized the murder was planned in her kitchen. BTW after the walk-through, the kids returned to the house and totally trashed it. Feces everywhere, holes in walls. My husband (her brother) passed away the day before. So between grieving for her brother she was totally horrified at what happened to her new house. Really classy people.
I think it's too much of a coincidence that there was a contract for the Andrew's Ave house right at the time they were finalizing the divorce settlement and almost exactly a year from the time they bought their new one -- kinda sounds to me like TLC made a deal with them to purchase it if it didn't sell within a year and/or was part of the agreement to keep Kate happy and receiving income. We'll see when the papers come through whether the house is in someone's name or hidden behind a trust/attorney name.
If walls could speak. I hope the buyer throws around some holy water and has a spiritual cleansing. There is no telling what sort of negative energy Kate left behind.
IN REPLY TO my9cats - My sister-in-law unknowingly bought the house of the sister and mother of the murderers of Ted Ammon by Danny Pelosi. Both women have the same first name. It was after she moved in and was getting calls from TV stations and magazines are far away as Australia that she realized the murder was planned in her kitchen. BTW after the walk-through, the kids returned to the house and totally trashed it. Feces everywhere, holes in walls. My husband (her brother) passed away the day before. So between grieving for her brother she was totally horrified at what happened to her new house. Really classy people.
HERE ARE THE FACTS, YOUR SISTER IN LAW KNEW DAM WELL WHO SHE WAS BUYING THE HOUSE FROM, SHE ACTUALLY THREATENED THE OWNER TO LOWER THE PRICE. SECOND, THE KIDS LIVED IN FLORIDA AND DID NOT TRASH IT, THIRD, THERE WERE NO PHONE CALLS TO THE HOUSE, SINCE THE NEW OWNER WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE THEIR PHONE NUMBER AND FINALLY,GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT, NO MURDER WAS PLANNED AT THAT HOUSE, THEY WERE A WONDERFUL FAMILY WHO LOVED THAT HOUSE AND THE BROTHER DID NOT COMMIT THE MURDER AND WAS WRONGLY CONVICTED AND NO ONE WANTED TO TALK TO HIS SISTER. CONTINUE THE SLANDEROUS REMARKS AND I WILL CONTACT A LAWYER.
HOW CAN THE POST FROM MY9CATS BE ALLOWED? DID THEY PRESENT PHOTO'S LIKE YOU STATE IN THE PUBLISHING RULES, ITEM #2. THAT POST IS BORDERLINE SLAND A FAMILY AND MADE UP A STORY TRYING TO INPLICATE THE SISTER AND HER CHILDREN IN A PLOT THAT IS TOTALLY UNTRUE.
Post a Comment
Want to see your comment published? Follow a few simple rules:
1. Do not use Anonymous. Pick a name (click Name/URL to type in a name) and stick to the same name.
2. Anonymous insider stories should be emailed to us directly (in confidence). They will not be posted here unless we can verify the validity, such as with photos. This is not to discourage legitimate insiders from speaking out, but to guard against all the fake stories out there.
3. No insulting other posters or picking fights, refusing to let things go and move on. Stop with the snotty comments--they will be rejected. Treat people here like how you would talk to the person you most respect in your life, it's just pleasant that way.
4. No trash talking other blogs/bloggers here.