Jon also commented:
mandapanda184 @jongosselin1 Oh good. So the reports that Kate shipped him somewhere without letting you know where, aren't true?
jongosselin1 @mandapanda184 that’s true but I found him
Saturday, May 12, 2018
Jon has found Collin, and Hannah is with him full time
In a very unexpected sextuplets birthday post, Jon wrote on Instagram that he and Hannah visited Collin for his belated birthday (Jon posted a few days ago on Hannah's birthday that he now has her every day and night). Collin has been missing for two years, and Kate has offered little explanation why, other than he is getting treatment.
Jon also commented:
mandapanda184 @jongosselin1 Oh good. So the reports that Kate shipped him somewhere without letting you know where, aren't true?
jongosselin1 @mandapanda184 that’s true but I found him
Jon also commented:
mandapanda184 @jongosselin1 Oh good. So the reports that Kate shipped him somewhere without letting you know where, aren't true?
jongosselin1 @mandapanda184 that’s true but I found him
1013 sediments (sic) from readers:
«Oldest ‹Older 1001 – 1013 of 1013 Newer› Newest»AuntieAnn (#200), you are poster #1000! Please decoupage yourself a festive paper-plate medallion to celebrate the occasion!
About the graduation...I know TFW can't physically block Jon's attendance. But she's just spiteful enough to deprive him of a ticket somehow. Nothing is beneath her.
He'd damn well better be allowed. That shrew has no right to keep him away from there, or weddings, or funerals. (Or her own garage sales for that matter)
========
But would TFW have the twins brainwashed enough to say they don’t want him there and would he respect their wishes if they said this.
He'd damn well better be allowed. That shrew has no right to keep him away from there, or weddings, or funerals. (Or her own garage sales for that matter)
&&&&&&&
It's a whole year away. Who knows how much things can change in the next year? He can sit anywhere he wants. There are no assigned seats. He could choose floor seating on a chair, or sit in the bleachers, out of sight. There would be no security keeping him out.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 78
I don't think any of us are quite clear on the details because Radar is only doing their summary of what is going on instead of just posting what they have and letting us readers figure it out.
Frankly I just don't trust Radar's summary. I am itching to see what they have. Like I said, this figure could be for anything, it could be about anything, there's just no guarantee Radar has summarized this in an accurate manner and even if they have, they are awfully short on the details.
May 30, 2018 at 7:02 PM
&&&&&&&&&&&
Admin, I meant to reply to this last week, but didn't get a chance and then forgot. I think you're right about Radar. I never trust them anyway because their "reporting" is always sloppy and inaccurate. As far as last week's TFW story, I think that Radar - at most - has a brief summary from the docket, or they were fed the story (by TFW):
https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/05/kate-gosselin-demands-thousands-ex-jon-court-battle/
Based on their own article, I don't think they've seen the actual court documents:
Kate Gosselin is demanding thousands from her ex-husband Jon in a bitter new legal battle, RadarOnline.com can exclusively report.
According to shocking court records obtained by Radar, the mother of eight filed a lawsuit against her ex-husband in March. She is demanding Jon cough up more than $132,000.
Although it remains unclear why the famed reality TV mom is demanding the money from her ex, Radar has learned Jon refuses to pay and has already lawyered up.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
If Radar actually has the "shocking court records", then why do they go on to say that "it remains unclear" why TFW is demanding money from Jon? If they actually have a copy of the complaint, they would know exactly why TFW is demanding the money.
As usual, Radar is full of it.
Regarding the definitions of Old Maid and Spinster, the term "Bachelor" refers to a man who has never married, not a divorced man. An older unmarried man used to be referred to as a "confirmed bachelor," meaning he preferred being single (for one reason or another) or was unlikely to marry.
But would TFW have the twins brainwashed enough to say they don’t want him there and would he respect their wishes if they said this.
====
It's hard to say. If the Today interview where they both clammed up and didn't 'use their words' is any indication of how much control she has over the twins opinion of their dad, there may be hope.
They're older now and might have a better understanding of the dynamics of their parent's divorce. Like PA Dutch Mom said it's a whole year away. Time will tell.
Check radaronline - they just posted new article....kate suing because jon filed to modify custody.... hjs lawyer countered asking court to cnange the $132, 000 to zero.
It's hard to say. If the Today interview where they both clammed up and didn't 'use their words' is any indication of how much control she has over the twins opinion of their dad, there may be hope.
They're older now and might have a better understanding of the dynamics of their parent's divorce. Like PA Dutch Mom said it's a whole year away. Time will tell.
&&&
Yes. It's hard to say. A kid could snap out of it very young, as Hannah has. They could snap out of it at 16-17 like Missy Francis. They could snap out of it at 25. Most will snap out of it, not all will. It's about your emotional intelligence and a whole lot of other things.
Given I think Mady is quite sharp and quite on to Kate, my money is on her snapping out of it, but I also think Mady, being savvy as she is, recognizes that Kate is her best chance to pile on the dough, not Jon. So, I think that plays in role in her allegiances.
I do think that snapping out of it later in life is worse, though. Hannah will be much, much better off because she realized what's up early and corrected it early, before her childhood was blown.
Radar has finally posted the actual docs. thanks Radar! Off to read!
https://radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Jon-Gosselin-Slams-Kate-132K-lawsuit-docs-1.pdf
Permanent Name in Blue said... 7
Check radaronline - they just posted new article....kate suing because jon filed to modify custody.... hjs lawyer countered asking court to cnange the $132, 000 to zero.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Wow, that's funny, right after I posted about last week's article. I had gone straight to the old article from a link in a previous post. I didn't even bother to check their home page. It's their top story right now.
Here's the new article - click the link in the middle of the article, they have the court filing (WHO gave this to Radar?!)
https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/06/jon-gosselin-slams-ex-wife-kate-132k-lawsuit/
Exclusive Details
It Gets Worse! Jon Slams Ex Kate’s Attempt To Collect $132K From Him In Court
He claims his former wife’s court filing is ‘against the best interest’ of the kids.
By Melissa Roberto
Posted on Jun 5, 2018 @ 18:29PM
Jon Gosselin is furious over his ex-wife Kate’s attempt to collect over $132,000 from him in court!
RadarOnline.com broke the news that Kate filed a lawsuit against Jon in March 2018, claiming that he owes her $132,875.
Now, in court documents exclusively obtained by Radar, Jon called Kate’s request “an inappropriate amount” of money.
As Radar previously reported, Kate claimed her ex-husband owes her money because he breached an alleged “agreement” between the exes. However, Jon’s attorneys pointed out in paperwork that Kate did “not provide any proof of the language of that agreement,” court docs stated.
In his latest response to the lawsuit on May 8, Jon explained that he believed the judgment has to do with “child support arrears” that would be owed to Kate if he “filed a petition to modify custody” of the kids. Neither Jon nor Kate’s filings make it clear whether or not any changes have been made to their pre-existing custody agreement.
READ THE SHOCKING DOCS HERE!
Jon’s attorneys requested the court to strike the judgment from $132,875 down to zero dollars.
Additionally, Jon claimed Kate’s request “prejudices the welfare and is against the best interest of the minor children.”
As Radar readers know, Jon and his daughter, Hannah have been posting photos and videos together within the last month. The father-daughter duo have fueled rumors that Hannah ditched Kate and moved in with Jon.
Most recently, Jon posted a selfie with Hannah announcing that “school is almost over.”
Jon also recently celebrated his “missing” son Collin’s birthday with him last month.
In 2016, the notoriously critical Kate accused Jon of acting inappropriately with Hannah in a shocking police report. Jon denied the claims.
Could Kate’s lawsuit be an act of retaliation for Hannah spending time with her dad? Let us know in the comments!
My synopsis:
There is a May 2012 agreement between Jon and Kate nobody has the actual docs of, but people seem to agree it says that if Jon tries to ever file for custody including legal custody, he will then owe Kate the 120k in arrears he previously owed plus 8k in interest and fees. (So basically she blackmailed him to keep the kids for a bounty, wow Kate, just wow)
My comments, so, it was never filming that had Jon over a barrel, but rather, Kate used the ARREARS as her bargaining chip to do whatever she wanted. Bingo.
Jon's attorneys are claiming that the original "agreement" is not valid prohibited by the Civil Rules of Procedure. Nice he has an attorney cracking a few books.
They also want to kick it because the terms are vague and nobody even has the actual terms.
They're also making a public policy argument (awesome!) that it's simply wrong for a parent to be able to blackmail a parent over support, that a parent should be free to petition the court at any time regarding what is in the best interest of the children, without fear of owing some huge sum. Exactly!
They're also making a best interest argument to strike the 2012 agreement because it's not in the best interest of the children (for Jon not to be able to seek custody, etc.)
This is a big bombshell. She is a total nightmare. She BLACKMAILED the guy for 7 years.
Admin (#11), thanks for translating all that into English for us non legal folks.
TFW is not just horrible. She's evil. Those details paint a picture of a Dickens villian, using her own children as pawns in her twisted game. Eight little meal tickets. Eight little bargaining chips. She makes me sick to my stomach.
new post
New comments are not allowed.